Kipling Secure alternatives

5 Best Kipling Secure Alternatives for MSPs in 2026

Kipling Secure is a well-funded AI-native XDR platform with a shadow AI module — but it doesn’t scan the Microsoft 365 tenant, its per-endpoint pricing is hard to model, and shadow AI rides inside a broader platform purchase. Below are the 5 strongest Kipling Secure alternatives, ranked, with ShadowLock at #1 for purpose-built, three-layer shadow AI detection at a transparent per-device price.

Join the WaitlistSee pricing

Why MSPs look for a Kipling Secure alternative

  • →No Microsoft 365 tenant scanning. Kipling Secure detects AI from endpoint and network telemetry but doesn’t enumerate Copilot plugins or third-party AI OAuth grants consented in your M365 tenant — the cloud half of shadow AI.
  • →Pricing that’s hard to model. Kipling prices per endpoint through the channel with no public per-seat number; buyers tell us translating it into a per-client renewal cost is the friction point.
  • →A platform purchase for a point problem. Shadow AI is one module inside a broad AI-native XDR suite. Teams that already run an EDR/XDR they like don’t want to migrate their detection stack just to govern AI.

Quick picks at a glance

#1ShadowLockTop pick
Best for
MSPs and IT teams that want focused shadow AI coverage across the endpoint, the browser, and the M365 tenant — at a price they can budget, without a platform migration.
Standout
M365 tenant scanning for Copilot plugins and third-party AI OAuth grants
#2DefensX
Best for
Shops that can mandate the DefensX-managed browser everywhere and want in-browser redaction with a strong marketplace co-sell.
Standout
Mature in-browser AI redaction and web-DLP
#3ThreatLocker
Best for
Shops standing up a single zero-trust posture across the whole endpoint stack.
Standout
Default-deny application control + Ringfencing across the endpoint
#4DNSFilter
Best for
MSPs that want a baseline DNS filter where shadow AI is one category among many.
Standout
Transparent pricing — G2 lists three editions $1.15–$3 per license
#5Control D
Best for
MSPs that want a transparently priced DNS-layer baseline rather than a platform.
Standout
Transparent $2/endpoint/month pricing

What to look for in a Kipling Secure alternative

M365 tenant scanning

Can it enumerate AI OAuth grants in your Microsoft 365 tenant via Graph? Copilot plugins, third-party AI add-ins, and user-consented apps that live in the cloud, not on the endpoint or the wire.

Shadow AI focus

Is shadow AI the product, or one module in a broad platform you also have to adopt for endpoint, identity, and network?

Content classification

Can it read the prompt or paste and decide allow / block on what’s in it — locally — versus categorical domain or app decisions?

Pricing model

Public per-seat tiers vs quote-only. The first lets procurement budget renewals; the second is a channel negotiation every cycle.

Runs beside your stack

Can you drop it in next to your existing EDR/XDR, or does adopting it mean consolidating your detection-and-response onto its platform?

The 5 best Kipling Secure alternatives, ranked

#1

ShadowLock

Top pick

Purpose-built, three-layer shadow AI detection — endpoint, browser, and Microsoft 365 tenant. Transparent per-device pricing.

What it is

A Windows endpoint agent + managed browser extension + Microsoft Graph integration built for one job: shadow AI. The agent monitors the clipboard and classifies content locally with Shannon entropy + Luhn validation; the extension force-installs into Chrome/Edge; the Graph integration scans the M365 tenant for AI OAuth grants and Copilot plugins. Multi-tenant from day one, and it runs beside whatever EDR/XDR you already have.

Why it's a Kipling Secure alternative

ShadowLock closes the two gaps that send MSPs looking past Kipling Secure: it scans the Microsoft 365 tenant for AI OAuth grants and Copilot plugins, and it publishes a per-device price you can model at renewal.

It’s also a focused control rather than a platform — drop it in next to your existing detection stack instead of consolidating onto a new AI-native XDR.

Join the WaitlistSee pricing
#2

DefensX

Browser-extension secure workspace with in-browser AI redaction. The best-known MSP-channel shadow AI tool.

What it is

A browser extension + endpoint agent that turns Chrome/Edge into a managed workspace, with an "Artificial Intelligence" web-filtering category and in-browser PII/code redaction before submission to LLMs. Channel-only via Pax8 / Sherweb / ConnectWise.

Why it's a Kipling Secure alternative

If your Kipling exit is about wanting a focused shadow AI tool rather than a broad XDR, DefensX is the other well-known option — but it enforces only inside the managed browser and, like Kipling, doesn’t scan the M365 tenant.

Full ShadowLock vs DefensX →
#3

ThreatLocker

Zero-trust endpoint platform. Blocks AI apps and domains, but doesn’t inspect prompts.

What it is

A broad zero-trust platform built around default-deny application allowlisting and Ringfencing. Web Control category-blocks AI web domains; application allowlisting prevents desktop AI apps from installing.

Why it's a Kipling Secure alternative

If the real reason you’re leaving Kipling is "we’d rather consolidate on a zero-trust platform we already trust," ThreatLocker is the heavier answer. It blocks AI tools at access time rather than inspecting prompts, and it doesn’t scan the M365 tenant either.

Full ShadowLock vs ThreatLocker →
#4

DNSFilter

AI-powered protective DNS with transparent MSP pricing. Resolver-layer category blocking.

What it is

A protective DNS service that blocks malicious and categorized domains (400+ SaaS apps, including an AI category) before the connection completes. Roaming clients for Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. CRN 2025 5-Star MSP partner program.

Why it's a Kipling Secure alternative

If you’re downgrading from "AI-native XDR" to "just block the AI domains at the edge," DNSFilter is a clean, transparently priced way to do it. It won’t read prompt content, won’t catch embedded AI inside approved SaaS, and won’t see M365 OAuth grants — but it’s a simple control with a public price.

Full ShadowLock vs DNSFilter →
#5

Control D

Transparent-pricing DNS filter with AI / ML threat blocking.

What it is

A DNS filtering and web security service with AI/ML threat blocking and published pricing. SMB pricing at $2/endpoint/month; MSP from $150/month minimum.

Why it's a Kipling Secure alternative

Control D is the option MSPs reach for when the lesson from a Kipling evaluation was "I want simplicity and a published price." Same structural limits as any DNS filter — no content visibility, no enforcement off-resolver, no M365 tenant scanning — but a clean control surface and a number on the page.

Full ShadowLock vs Control D →

Choose the right alternative for your situation

If your situation is…Best pick
You need shadow AI coverage in the M365 tenant, not just on the endpoint and network.ShadowLock
You want a focused shadow AI control that runs beside your existing EDR/XDR.ShadowLock
You can mandate a managed browser everywhere and want in-browser redaction.DefensX
You’re consolidating onto a single zero-trust endpoint platform.ThreatLocker (+ ShadowLock for content + M365)
You just want a transparently priced DNS filter as a baseline.DNSFilter or Control D

Frequently asked questions

Why are MSPs looking for a Kipling Secure alternative in 2026?+

The two recurring drivers are Microsoft 365 tenant coverage (Kipling doesn’t scan for Copilot plugins or AI OAuth grants) and pricing clarity (per-endpoint, but hard to translate into a per-client renewal cost). A third is scope: shadow AI is one module in a broad AI-native XDR platform, and teams that already run a detection stack they like don’t want to migrate onto a new one.

Does any tool on this list scan Microsoft 365 for shadow AI?+

ShadowLock does, via its Microsoft Graph integration — it enumerates AI OAuth grants and Copilot plugins consented in the tenant. The browser, DNS, and zero-trust options on this list operate on the endpoint or the network and don’t enumerate cloud-side M365 grants, which is exactly the gap Kipling shares.

Can ShadowLock run alongside Kipling Secure during a migration?+

They can coexist during an evaluation, though running two endpoint agents long-term isn’t usually the goal. Most MSPs pilot ShadowLock on a subset of endpoints — often specifically to cover the M365 tenant gap — and then decide whether to consolidate.

Get the top pick

Join the Waitlist